tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post2713601160851456427..comments2023-05-11T13:16:53.422+01:00Comments on 'Ville Views: Fear and Loathing in ThanetJames Maskellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15441611588943798565noreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-4560726994257707272012-09-01T13:40:31.125+01:002012-09-01T13:40:31.125+01:00Are'nt we all to somebody, 12:28, but I still ...Are'nt we all to somebody, 12:28, but I still don't know what your point is unless you want to show us all how many names you can remember. John Worrow's mate Clive.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-37119940670519952732012-09-01T12:28:23.594+01:002012-09-01T12:28:23.594+01:00Sylvester Stallone is worth somethingSylvester Stallone is worth somethingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-39495616974887978742012-09-01T09:14:07.551+01:002012-09-01T09:14:07.551+01:00Sylvester Stallone!Sylvester Stallone!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-39690061664452255912012-08-31T21:38:38.069+01:002012-08-31T21:38:38.069+01:00Chris WellsChris WellsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-48067859727742287892012-08-31T14:15:26.802+01:002012-08-31T14:15:26.802+01:0019:45
Why would you suddenly write 'Roger Lat...19:45<br /><br />Why would you suddenly write 'Roger Latchford.' Is it that you have to jot down names that come to you lest you forget or do you just enjoy writing names?<br /><br />Meet all sorts on blogs and some are decidely odd. 'Fred Bloggs.'<br />'Albert Higginbottom.' 'Frazier Crawdord.' Nope, it does nothing for me at all. Perhaps I'm missing something.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-8443699977894852332012-08-31T08:23:00.602+01:002012-08-31T08:23:00.602+01:00Really, 19:48, when exactly was that or is it all ...Really, 19:48, when exactly was that or is it all down to your over active imagination. As far as I recall, apartheid in South Africa ended back in the 90's and I was not even blogging then.<br /><br />It would be much more likely, since most of the world's troubles over the last 50 years stem from difference, that I belief Africa is for Africans in the same way England should be for the English.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-24377164280498517082012-08-30T19:48:00.983+01:002012-08-30T19:48:00.983+01:00Tom Clarke justified apartheid in South AfricaTom Clarke justified apartheid in South AfricaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-48598855694368964262012-08-30T19:45:48.591+01:002012-08-30T19:45:48.591+01:00Roger LatchfordRoger LatchfordAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-91781011262277779852012-08-30T18:39:45.451+01:002012-08-30T18:39:45.451+01:00You should approach the Guinness Book of Records f...You should approach the Guinness Book of Records for the longest winded 'no thank you' on record. Enjoy the rest of the evening.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-72246621928796007272012-08-30T17:47:23.008+01:002012-08-30T17:47:23.008+01:00"Tom Clarke", I suggested to James Maske..."Tom Clarke", I suggested to James Maskell that there was no point in perpetuating the exchange with you and "Ren Wood", but your offensive, mischievous and duplicitous post of 14.31 can't pass without comment. Indeed you have attracted quite a lot of (rightly) critical contributions from others during the course of the day. <br /><br />For you to call anyone else a hypocrite is a perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black, to coin a very old saying. So let's ignore that bit of demeaning bile on your part and move on.<br /><br />I did not say that no-one should mention others - Harrison, John or whoever - who have made offensive, homophobic or whatever remarks. Nor did I say I condoned them. I specifically said I do NOT condone such bad behaviour. And I simply explained to the other contributor that Harrison and John had not so far been the subject of any exchanges - which is why they hadn't been mentioned. I did NOT say they should not be. <br /><br />But you know all this. As ever, you're simply stooping to ever greater depths to cause trouble and to deflect attention from the group of people - certain local elected Tories - whom you have set yourself a personal mission to defend at all costs.<br /><br />You offer no comment on the tactics of those, like Moores, who have attacked Worrow and continue to do so, printing gossip and smears in the fashion of delinquent children. Your only recourse, aided by others like "Ren Wood" is either to accuse me of being Worrow, or an ally of his, or to draw attention to Worrow's behaviour. I wonder if your entire life has been spent deflecting others from the truth just as you seem to deny it to yourself?<br /><br />Whatever, I do not care. And if a "meeting of minds" meant coming anywhere close to what occupies yours, then NO THANK YOU.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-6829990818554602792012-08-30T16:51:28.112+01:002012-08-30T16:51:28.112+01:00Its ok to commit homophobic hate crimes as long as...Its ok to commit homophobic hate crimes as long as you get your grammar right. <br /><br /><br />No no.... any decent person that was elected under the conservative banner could be excused for resigning the whip when they have colleagues like Ken Gregory who have more in common with Nick Griffin than they do David Cameron. <br /><br />*You have no problem with Cllr Gregory and his ilk resigning the whip... that says a lot about you! <br /><br />Are you too thick to understand that it is the "GREGORY ATTITUDE" that put Thanet Cons where they are today- NOT the victims of the Attitude - the victims get stronger the moores you attack them!<br /><br />Yous mae never makes grammar typos butt in real terms yous is as thick as too stort planksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-31666764180365904922012-08-30T15:40:38.796+01:002012-08-30T15:40:38.796+01:0015:21 Suggest you read through your last comment, ...15:21 Suggest you read through your last comment, amend and correct the grammar and then we might all understand it.<br /><br />Furthermore, if you cannot see the difference between someone who gets elected under a banner, which he then renounces, and someone forced to resign from their party because of a conduct issue, you have my deepest sympathy.<br /><br />As for the 'sicko' as you quaintly put it in your lower deck lingo, did he/she not point out that they stick the pins for his renegade conduct, not his sexual persuassion.<br /><br />Maybe advisable for you to start some night classes in English, by the way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-65928542378778193472012-08-30T15:21:47.197+01:002012-08-30T15:21:47.197+01:00Sandy Ez, Ken Gregory, the cat loving mayor and th...Sandy Ez, Ken Gregory, the cat loving mayor and the drink drive Cllr were forced "turncoats" yet the sicko above has no problem with them. He digs pins into a doll of an LGBT councillor who it would seem left to escape people like Ken Gregory. . Small group of showing up the party and being supported by like a minded minority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-19397200054220119212012-08-30T14:54:22.563+01:002012-08-30T14:54:22.563+01:00To so called "Anonymous"
Can't help...To so called "Anonymous"<br /><br />Can't help but feel that if the roles had been reversed and the phone call had been Mike, with the shirt lifter bit down to Ken, then there would still be some people making more of the Tory indiscretion.<br /><br />Anycase, what about Elton John's cancer wish raised by another commentator, was that OK since you do not seem to condemn it.<br /><br />All in all, the Mike and Ken offences severity have been flogged to death previously and there is really no point in resurrecting it all over again. Perhaps we should all move on.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-89845979310869154212012-08-30T14:47:43.175+01:002012-08-30T14:47:43.175+01:00Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it a Conse...Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it a Conservative PM who is trying to introduce equal marriage. Doesn't James, author of this blog, support that move, as does Laura Sandys and several other Thanet Conservatives.<br /><br />Nonetheless, SOMEONE (and no prizes for guessing who) wants to perpetuate the myth that the nasty Tories are homophobic. Some probably are but then so are some Labour folk.<br /><br />As for the alleged victim. I think more people despise him for his turncoat behaviour than his sexual orientation, leastways, thats why I stick pins in my voodoo doll of him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-5742602951344287382012-08-30T14:43:11.130+01:002012-08-30T14:43:11.130+01:00To: so-called Tom Clarke
Dialing someones persona...To: so-called Tom Clarke<br /><br />Dialing someones personal telephone number and saying "WITH A BIT OF LUCK YOU'LL GET AIDS" is not similar to making a rude homonphobic remark on a private facebook wall. This is why one is considered a HATE CRIME and the other is not. If you were LGBT you would know that we hear Harrison's comments a lot BUT we do not get ofensive AIDS DEATH WISHES left on our answerphones. You have no idea!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-86463399976774848022012-08-30T14:32:41.031+01:002012-08-30T14:32:41.031+01:00No wonder an LBGT councillor left the Thanet Con g...No wonder an LBGT councillor left the Thanet Con group with Thanet Con candidates like James looking forward to a proven hate crime councillor returning to council. Only one councillor has a record for making an AIDS death wish comment and all the sick lot on here can do is attempt to demonise his victim.. they must think that readers are thick.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-33987045537580520582012-08-30T14:31:22.893+01:002012-08-30T14:31:22.893+01:00What a total hypocrite you are, Anon 11:58. OK fo...What a total hypocrite you are, Anon 11:58. OK for you to attack James over Ken Gregory but somebody else must not mention Mike Harrison's similar poor behaviour. <br /><br />As you said, this debate will go nowhere, but you are so damn self righteous in your stance making even the slightest meeting of minds impossible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-80420972705381427022012-08-30T11:58:37.850+01:002012-08-30T11:58:37.850+01:00Anon, get your facts right, please. I have not def...Anon, get your facts right, please. I have not defended Worrow. I have pointed out the hypocrisy and bad behaviour on the part of his attackers. That is very different. And I do not condone others' bad behaviour, but neither Harrison nor John were the subjects here - until you introduced them, "Chummy". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-88690311645529419732012-08-30T09:23:03.517+01:002012-08-30T09:23:03.517+01:00Didn't Labour also welcome back Mike Harrison ...Didn't Labour also welcome back Mike Harrison despite his homophobic attack on Ian Driver or doesn't that count. Bit like dear old Elton who wished cancer of the clitoris on some lady photographers. Presumably that wasn't sick either.<br /><br />It all depends what side of the divide we sit on as to the degree of alleged disgust, in the way that chummy above perpetually attacks Moores and defends Worrow. At least prejudice is alive and kicking ALL ROUND!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-74682804906625486422012-08-30T06:18:40.058+01:002012-08-30T06:18:40.058+01:00James, as the Anon (but not the one of 21.14) join...James, as the Anon (but not the one of 21.14) joining battle with "Ren Wood" and "Tom Clarke", I see no point in continuing this fruitless exchange. There are very different sets of beliefs and principles in play here that will not be reconciled. Everyone should move on.<br /><br />A pity you ended your intervention on such a sick note, though. A pity that fellow Conservatives will positively welcome someone who has behaved so disgustingly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-36669022875878614512012-08-29T23:35:28.970+01:002012-08-29T23:35:28.970+01:00Im happy to let you guys carry on and duke it out ...Im happy to let you guys carry on and duke it out or we can call it a day and move on. Im hoping to stick a new blog up before the weekend, other commitments considered.<br /><br />As for Ken Gregory, I look look forward to his return to the Council Chamber.James Maskellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15441611588943798565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-4805878303181517042012-08-29T21:14:50.210+01:002012-08-29T21:14:50.210+01:00Homophobic bullying comes in many forms. Only one ...Homophobic bullying comes in many forms. Only one Thanet Councillor has committed a hate crime, that is Ken Gregory, who belongs to North Thanet Conservative Association. By attacking his victim you are EXPOSED! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-84432975262039819702012-08-29T20:36:36.674+01:002012-08-29T20:36:36.674+01:00"Ren Wood", trying to back away from you..."Ren Wood", trying to back away from your earlier contributions just doesn't work. And you know perfectly well what I mean when I refer to the actions of other bloggers and their attacks on fellow politicians. I have set out my views in detail in contributions here. Your inability to see anything wrong in what is being promoted on Thanet Life says much about you and where you come from.<br /><br />Councillor Moores has issued warnings of legal action against people in the past for alleged breaches of libel laws. Does your last point refer to him? Or are you referring to Councillor Worrow - adopting the usual practice, amongst his critics, of not naming him, but making snide, insidious suggestions instead? Whatever, my answer is the same. I do not know either of them personally; I have never met either of them. I hope that is clear enough for you.<br /><br />As you rightly say, you cannot enact your threat against me. We are all blogging anonymously. Similarly, you cannot accuse me of demeaning "Tom Clarke" as he is anonymous too. By the way, the "authority" for this concept - that anonymous bloggers cannot claim they have been libelled etc. because they are not "real" named individuals- is the very same Councillor (Moores) you are seeking to protect and defend at all costs<br /><br />Now why not go and watch the Paralympic coverage, and real people who have fought against the odds to deliver and achieve something really worthwhile.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451795692810208788.post-74946525787549667352012-08-29T19:13:00.470+01:002012-08-29T19:13:00.470+01:00Like I said, this time I was directing my comment ...Like I said, this time I was directing my comment at you. From time to time I might comment on other things that interest me. I have no clue what you are on about people pillorying other political opponents but that would not be my scene anyway.<br /><br />As for threats, I merely said I would like to wipe the supercillious face. Since there is no chance it does not constitute a threat though strange you use the threat of legal infringement yourself. Another well known local character has similar tendencies when it comes to reporting others for percieved infringements. Do you know each other perchance?Ren Woodnoreply@blogger.com